From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 18, 2002
85 S.W.3d 300 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 1784-01

Delivered: September 18, 2002

On Appellant's Petition For Discretionary Review From The Sixth Court Of Appeals Gregg County

Ebb B. Mobley, Longview, for Appellant.

William Jennings, District Attorney, Longview, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.


OPINION


Appellant was convicted in a trial by jury of aggravated robbery. The jury subsequently assessed punishment at 15 years confinement in the institutional division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. On appeal, appellant asserted that the trial court erred in entering a deadly-weapon finding in its judgment. The Texarkana Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence. Gray v. State, 51 S.W.3d 856 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2001). We granted appellant's sole question for review: "Is it necessary to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to challenge a deadly weapon finding in the judgment?"

Having examined the record and briefs and considered the arguments in the case, we have reached the conclusion that our decision to grant review was improvident. We therefore dismiss the appellant's petition as improvidently granted.


Summaries of

Gray v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 18, 2002
85 S.W.3d 300 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002)
Case details for

Gray v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEMARKUS JOSEPH GRAY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Sep 18, 2002

Citations

85 S.W.3d 300 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002)