Gray v. State

Full title: RAJIV GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 12, 2022

No. 4D22-1046 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 12, 2022)

Opinion

4D22-1046

10-12-2022

RAJIV GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Rajiv Gray, Milton, pro se. No appearance filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Nickolaus H. Davis, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 08-5164CF10A. 08-8433CF10A,08-9624CF10A, 08-15443CF10A and 09-6445CF10A.

Rajiv Gray, Milton, pro se.

No appearance filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Newman v. State, 49 So.3d 843, 845 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“Assuming that a deficiency existed in the temporary appointment of the county court judge to the circuit court, this provides no basis for postconviction relief. Jurisdiction is determined by the court, not the judge.”) (citations omitted).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.