Opinion
C 10-3474 WHA
11-28-2011
KENNETH WAYNE GRAY, Plaintiff, v. R. SALAO, et al., Defendants.
BENJAMIN SITTER Attorney for Plaintiff Kenneth Gray BRENDAN KENNY Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants Biaggini, Boccella, Hedrick, Muniz, Park, Peterson, Salao, Smith, and Williams
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
MICHAEL W. JORGENSON
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
BRENDAN M. KENNY
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 237969
Attorneys for Defendants Biaggini, Boccella,
Hedrick, Muniz, Park, Peterson, Salao, Smith, and
Williams
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DUE DATE FOR
DEFENDANTS' REPLY REGARDING DEFENDANTS' SUMMARY-JUDGMENT MOTION
Judge The Honorable
Under Civil Local Rules 6-2(a) and 7-12, the parties request that this Court change the due date for Defendants' reply regarding their summary-judgment motion from November 28, 2011 to December 1, 2011.
On November 3, 2011, Defendants filed a summary-judgment motion. (Docket Nos. 44-54.) Defendants set the motion to be heard on December 8, 2011. Defendants' reply regarding their summary-judgment motion is due on November 28, 2011, based on federal-court holidays.
The parties tenatively agreed to settle the case on November 23, 2011, subject to the approval of Plaintiff Kenneth Gray.
Based on these facts, the parties jointly request that this Court extend the time for Defendants to file a reply regarding Defendants' summary-judgment motion from November 28, 2011, to December 1, 2011.
SO STIPULATED:
BENJAMIN SITTER
Attorney for Plaintiff Kenneth Gray
BRENDAN KENNY
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants Biaggini, Boccella, Hedrick, Muniz, Park, Peterson, Salao, Smith, and
Williams
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Court will extend the time for defendants to file a reply from November 28, 2011, to November 29, 2011.
William Alsup
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE