Gray v. Knight Sec. & Patrol, Inc.

3 Citing cases

  1. Whitehorn v. McCann

    Civil Action 1:24-cv-01105-SKC-STV (D. Colo. Jan. 14, 2025)

    Id. (citing In re Dierschke, 975 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir. 1992)); Gray v. Knight Sec. & Patrol, Inc, No. 16-cv-03086-PAB-KLM, 2017 WL 11569537, at *2 (D. Colo. May 26, 2017) (citing Hunt, 1995 WL 523646, at *3). These factors are not “talismanic”-the court may consider other factors and need not consider all the factors.

  2. Nutrien AG Sols. v. Amazing Grains Farm, MST Agri, LLC

    Civil Action 1:22-cv-03199-SKC-NRN (D. Colo. Feb. 2, 2024)

    . The principal factors in determining whether a defendant has met the good cause standard are: (1) whether the default was the result of culpable conduct of the defendant, (2) whether the plaintiff would be prejudiced if the default should be set aside, and (3) whether the defendant presented a meritorious defense. Id. (citing In re Dierschke, 975 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir. 1992)); Gray v. Knight Sec. & Patrol, Inc, No. 16-cv-03086-PAB-KLM, 2017 WL 11569537, at *2 (D. Colo. May 26, 2017) (citing Hunt, 1995 WL 523646, at *3). These factors are not “talismanic,” and the court may consider other factors, and the court need not consider all the factors. Hunt, 1995 WL 523646, at *3.

  3. ONEflight Int'l v. Thaw

    Civil Action 22-cv-00237-NYW (D. Colo. Mar. 9, 2022)

    Even without the Motion for Extension, these factors weigh in favor of finding good cause to vacate the Clerk's entry of default. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c); Gray v. Knight Sec. & Patrol, Inc., No. 16-cv-03086-PAB-KLM, 2017 WL 11569537, at *2 (D. Colo. May 26, 2017) (considering the following factors in determining whether an entry of default should be vacated: “(1) whether the defendants' culpable conduct led to the default; (2) whether the plaintiffs will be prejudiced by setting aside the entry of default; and (3) whether the defendants have a meritorious defense)).