From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 23, 2021
1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC)

08-23-2021

DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE RE:

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE FILED ON

AUGUST 20, 2021

(ECF No. 50)

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

This case is currently set for settlement conference on September 15, 2021, before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.

On August 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice expressing her desire to continue the settlement conference until after a consultation with a neurosurgeon. (ECF No. 50.) Defendants are HEREBY directed to file a response to Plaintiffs notice within five (5) days from the date of service of this order indicating whether they believe the settlement conference should be vacated and/or continued.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 23, 2021
1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Gray v. Khoo

Case Details

Full title:DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 23, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)