From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 20, 2022
1:20-cv-01047-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01047-ADA-SAB (PC)

10-20-2022

DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO AMEND THE ANSWER AND MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER AS WITHDRAWN (ECF NOS. 122, 128)

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On September 23, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to amend the answer and modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 122)

On October 19, 2022, Defendants filed a notice to withdraw their motion to amend the answer and modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 128.) Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendants' motion to amend the answer and modify the scheduling order pursuant to notice of withdrawal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 20, 2022
1:20-cv-01047-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Gray v. Khoo

Case Details

Full title:DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 20, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-01047-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)