From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC)

06-13-2022

DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE THE DEPOSITION OF INMATE TOVAR

(ECF NO. 95)

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to vacate the deposition of inmate Tovar, filed May 23, 2022. Defendants filed an opposition on June 10, 2022. Although the time for a reply has not expired, the Court deems Plaintiff's motion submitted. Local Rule 230(1).

Plaintiff contends that Defendants took the deposition of inmate Tovar on April 26, 2022, without making arrangements for him to attend. However, Defendants submit that the deposition of inmate Tovar did not occur, and Plaintiff was served with both the notices of deposition and notice that the deposition had been cancelled. (Declaration of J. Gronna at ¶¶ 3-4.) Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to vacate the deposition of inmate Tovar is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gray v. Khoo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Gray v. Khoo

Case Details

Full title:DANA GRAY, Plaintiff, v. A. KHOO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 13, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)