From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Hedlund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1997
244 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 19, 1997

(Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. — Summary Judgment.)

Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motions of defendants L.B. of Falconer Corporation, doing business as Long Branch Restaurant Hotel (Long Branch), and Ted Langworthy, doing business as Bull Frog Hotel (Bull Frog), for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Although Bull Frog met its initial burden, plaintiffs submitted competent circumstantial evidence raising an issue of fact whether defendant Shawnee I. Hedlund was visibly intoxicated when served alcohol at its establishment. Long Branch, on the other hand, failed to establish as a matter of law that Hedlund was not visibly intoxicated when served alcoholic beverages at its establishment ( see, Reynolds v. Studley, 217 A.D.2d 1000; Nesbitt v. Jackson, 178 A.D.2d 931, 932).


Summaries of

Gray v. Hedlund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1997
244 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Gray v. Hedlund

Case Details

Full title:BONNIE S. GRAY et al., Respondents, v. SHAWNEE I. HEDLUND et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
667 N.Y.S.2d 325

Citing Cases

Aughenbaugh v. Napper Tandy's of Northport

After issue was joined, the defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon the…