From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 14, 2008
1:08-cv-00717-AWI TAG HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)

Opinion

1:08-cv-00717-AWI TAG HC.

October 14, 2008


DEADLINE: November 12, 2008

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PETITION (Doc. 12)


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 9, 2008, Respondent filed the instant motion requesting an extension of time to November 12, 2008, to file a response to the petition. (Doc. 12). As grounds therefore, Respondent's counsel contends that the records necessary to provide a correct and complete response to the petition have been ordered, but that a portion of them have not yet arrived. The Court has read and considered Respondent's motion, finds that good cause exists to grant it, and makes the following orders:

1. Respondent's motion for an extension of time (Doc. 12), is GRANTED; and

2. Respondent shall have to and including November 12, 2008, to file a response to the petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gray v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 14, 2008
1:08-cv-00717-AWI TAG HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Gray v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL C. GRAY, Petitioner, v. J.D. HARTLEY, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 14, 2008

Citations

1:08-cv-00717-AWI TAG HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)