From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Gastelo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2019
No. LA CV 18-00581-VBF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2019)

Opinion

No. LA CV 18-00581-VBF (FFM)

03-29-2019

CARL REGINALD GRAY, Petitioner, v. JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER Adopting the Report & Recommendation: Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition, Dismissing the Action With Prejudice, Directing the Entry of Separate Judgment, and Terminating the Case (JS-6)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 16). Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that:

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED for lack of merit.

The Court will enter final judgment consistent with the R&R by separate document as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a).

The Court will rule on a certificate of appealability by separate order.

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The case shall be TERMINATED and closed (JS-6). Dated: March 29, 2019

/s/_________

Hon. Valerie Baker Fairbank

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gray v. Gastelo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2019
No. LA CV 18-00581-VBF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Gray v. Gastelo

Case Details

Full title:CARL REGINALD GRAY, Petitioner, v. JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 29, 2019

Citations

No. LA CV 18-00581-VBF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2019)