From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Cassie

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 17, 2022
2:22-cv-00099-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00099-JDP (PC)

10-17-2022

FORREST GRAY, Plaintiff, v. CASSIE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION ON SERVICE ECF No. 20

EREMY D. PETERSONJ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 3, 2022, the court found that plaintiff's complaint stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment sexual assault claim against defendant Cassie and directed service under the court's E-Service program. ECF No. 15 at 2-3. Cassie was served shortly thereafter. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff filed a motion seeking clarification on whether he needed to sign a service form. ECF No. 20.

Plaintiff's motion is granted, and the court hereby confirms that plaintiff does not need to take action regarding service at this time. If the court determines that plaintiff needs to take action regarding service in the future, it will inform him by way of order or minute order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gray v. Cassie

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 17, 2022
2:22-cv-00099-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Gray v. Cassie

Case Details

Full title:FORREST GRAY, Plaintiff, v. CASSIE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 17, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00099-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)