Opinion
Case. 1:15-cv-01469
09-02-2015
Richard Gray, Plaintiff, v. Carissa E. Brinker et al., Defendants.
Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 9/9/2015
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil (F Deck)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (requiring dismissal of a case upon a determination that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted).
Plaintiff, a resident of Warner Robins, Georgia, sues a county court and an attorney in the county under the federal Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. He seeks money damages for the alleged failure of the county court to maintain "accurate and truthful records which resulted in an adverse effect on the Plaintiff." Compl. at 3. Since the Privacy Act applies only to federal agencies, Martinez v. Bureau of Prisons, 444 F.3d 620, 624 (D.C. Cir. 2006), this case will be dismissed. A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. Date: September 2nd , 2015
/s/_________
United States District Judge