From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 1972
288 A.2d 828 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1972)

Summary

construing strictly correlative four-year manifestation requirement of disease act, "there is unhappily a practical limit to the amounts of benefits employers and the public can provide."

Summary of this case from Barna v. W.C.A.B

Opinion

Argued September 13, 1971

March 28, 1972.

Workmen's compensation — Occupational disease — The Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act, Act 1939, June 21, P. L. 566 — Limitation of actions — Time of disability or death — Last exposure.

1. Disability or death to be compensable under The Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act, Act 1939, June 21, P. L. 566, must occur within four years after the employee was last employed in an occupation in which he was exposed to the hazard in question. [592-4]

Argued September 13, 1971, before Judges CRUMLISH, JR., MANDERINO and ROGERS, sitting as a panel of three. Submitted on briefs to President Judge BOWMAN and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR., MENCER and BLATT. Judge MANDERINO did not participate in the decision.

Appeal, No. 449 C.D. 1971, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County in case of Anna S. Gray, Claimant, Widow of Thomas K. Gray, deceased, v. Bethlehem Steel Company and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, No. 803, March Term, 1970.

Application to Workmen's Compensation Board for occupational disease death benefits. Claim denied. Claimant appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County. Reversed. CALDWELL, J. Defendants appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Reversed. Order of Workmen's Compensation Board reinstated.

James K. Thomas, with him Metzger, Hafer, Keefer, Thomas and Wood, for appellant, Bethlehem Steel Company.

Samuel C. Vary and Clyde M. Hughes, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant, Commonwealth.

Richard L. Placey, with him Shumaker, Williams Placey, for appellee.


This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County setting aside a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board which had dismissed a fatal claim petition filed by the widow of Thomas K. Gray.

Appellant, Bethlehem Steel Company, employed claimant's decedent as a bricklayer, an occupation in which he was exposed to silica hazard. The decedent last worked as a bricklayer for the appellant on February 11, 1963. On that date he became disabled as a result of lung cancer. He received sickness and accident benefits from February 11, 1963 until August 30, 1963, at which time he was retired. Although silicosis was present as early as February 1963, the decedent was not found to be disabled on that account until July 6, 1967.

The court below held that the claimant was entitled to compensation on the fatal claim petition despite the fact that her husband's disability from silicosis occurred more than four years after his last employment in an occupational hazard. This was error.

Section 301(c) of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act, Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 566, as amended, 77 P. S. § 1401(c), provides pertinently: "Wherever compensable disability or death is mentioned as a cause for compensation under this act, it shall mean only compensable disability or death resulting from occupational disease and occurring within four years after the date of his last employment in such occupation or industry."

In Gawlick v. Glen Alden Coal Company, 178 Pa. Super. 149, 113 A.2d 346 (1955), upon facts essentially identical to those here, the court held that the phrase "occurring within three [now four] years after the date of his last employment in such occupation or industry" meant that death or disability must occur within three years from the date when the claimant's decedent or the disabled claimant was last employed in an occupation in which he was exposed to a hazard and not three years from when he was last employed by the defendant in any capacity. Judge WOODSIDE wrote: " Such occupation or industry must refer to an occupation or industry in which the employe is exposed to a silicosis hazard." 178 Pa. Super. at 151, 113 A.2d at 348. Thus, Gawlick defined employment as used in Section 301(c) to mean exposure. Gawlick was followed in Holt v. Sunray Electric, Inc. et al., 186 Pa. Super. 594, 142 A.2d 509 (1958). There Judge GUNTHER concluded his opinion: "In Gawlick v. Glen Alden Coal Company, [citation] we held that the limitation of three years commenced from the date the employe was last employed in an occupation in which he was exposed to this hazard and not three years from the date he was last employed by his employer in any capacity." 186 Pa. Super. at 600, 142 A.2d at 512.

Again on facts not materially different from those here, compensation was denied in Singer v. Carbon Malleable Casting Company, 5 Pa. D. C.2d 248 (1955).

So that there may be no question of any significant distinction of facts, the chronology of Gawlick and the instant case are here set out:

Gawlick (3-year statute) Gray (4-year statute) March 24, 1948 February 11, 1963 date of last employment in date of last employment in hazard-exposed employment hazard-exposed employment

Jan. 4, 1952 August 31, 1963 date of last employment by date decedent's name last defendant appeared on defendant's employment rolls

April 2, 1952 July 4, 1967 date of death as a result date on which claimant became of exposure totally disabled as a result of exposure

Limitations, because they are arbitrary, are often harsh. The benefits of The Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act, as those of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 77 P. S. § 1 et seq., are founded upon actuarial facts. There is unhappily a practical limit to the amounts of benefits employers and the public can provide. This limit must be established by the Legislature possessed of all the facts, not by a court deciding one case, however unfortunate. Gawlick, having stood untouched by the Legislature for sixteen years may not be disturbed by us.

The order of the court below is reversed and the decision and order of the Workmen's Compensation Board is reinstated.


Summaries of

Gray v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 1972
288 A.2d 828 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1972)

construing strictly correlative four-year manifestation requirement of disease act, "there is unhappily a practical limit to the amounts of benefits employers and the public can provide."

Summary of this case from Barna v. W.C.A.B
Case details for

Gray v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Case Details

Full title:Gray v. Bethlehem Steel Company and Commonwealth

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 28, 1972

Citations

288 A.2d 828 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1972)
288 A.2d 828

Citing Cases

Weldon v. Celotex Corp.

" Id. at 152, 113 A.2d at 348. The Commonwealth Court reached the same conclusion in Bethlehem Steel Co. v.…

Barna v. W.C.A.B

Id. Provisions such as the above are designed to limit an employer's liability by excluding claims based on…