From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gravley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 3, 1989
553 So. 2d 52 (Ala. 1989)

Opinion

88-338.

July 21, 1989. Rehearing Denied November 3, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Jefferson County, No. CV-86-504-138, Jack D. Carl, J.

Alva C. Caine of Hare, Wynn, Newell Newton, Birmingham, for appellant.

Robert M. Girardeau and Jack M. Beard, Jr., of Huie, Fernambucq Stewart, Birmingham, for appellee.


The issue in this case is whether Alabama, North Carolina, or South Carolina law should apply to the insurance policy providing uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage involved in this case. Our cases of Best v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 540 So.2d 1381 (Ala. 1989), and Cotton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 540 So.2d 1387 (Ala. 1989), hold that the law of the state where the insurance contract was made and maintained will control absent a contrary provision in the contract. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed on the authority of Best and Cotton.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gravley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 3, 1989
553 So. 2d 52 (Ala. 1989)
Case details for

Gravley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Larry William GRAVLEY v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 3, 1989

Citations

553 So. 2d 52 (Ala. 1989)

Citing Cases

Zitterow v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

The policy was in effect when Zitterow was injured in Alabama by a vehicle operated by Truman Ball, an…

Kruger Commodities v. U.S. Fidelity

Ex parte Owen, 437 So.2d 476, 481 (Ala. 1983) (per curiam). See also Cincinnati Ins. Co., Inc. v. Girod, 570…