From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gravley v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 29, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-1326 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-1326.

March 29, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Steven Gravely's complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was submitted to the Court on September 29, 2009, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on February 2, 2010, recommended that the Plaintiff's Motion to File Supplemental Complaint (Doc. 12) be denied without prejudice to his right to raise his claims in a new action. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was sent to Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail to his place of confinement. Objections were due on or before February 16, 2010, but none have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29 day of March, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to File Supplemental Complaint (Doc. 12) is DENIED without prejudice to his right to raise his claims in a new action. The Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Bissoon (Doc. 23) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Gravley v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 29, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-1326 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Gravley v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN GRAVLEY, JR., Plaintiffs, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 29, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-1326 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2010)