From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gravitt v. Tyzkiewicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 23, 2011
Case Number 00-10237 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number 00-10237

08-23-2011

DARWIN GRAVITT, Petitioner, v. ZBGNIEW TYZKIEWICZ, Respondent.


Honorable David M. Lawson

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

On August 4, 2011, the Court entered an order denying the petitioner's motion for relief from judgment. On August 15, 2011, the petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's order. Motions for reconsideration may be granted pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(1) when the moving party to shows (1) a "palpable defect," (2) that misled the court and the parties, and (3) that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3). A "palpable defect" is a defect which is obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain. Mich. Dep't of Treasury v.Michalec, 181 F. Supp. 2d 731, 734 (E.D. Mich. 2002) (citations omitted). However, motions for reconsideration should not be granted when they "merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication." E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3).

The motion was filed in this habeas corpus action that has been closed since April 2001, when the Court granted the respondent's motion to dismiss because the petition was filed after the statute of limitations expired. The court of appeals affirmed that ruling. Since that time, the petitioner has filed several letters attacking the decision and advancing other reasons to challenge his confinement. At least one of those letters was stricken because it was illegible. The Court has previously rejected these arguments as lacking merit on several occasions, and the Court cannot discern a palpable defect by which it was misled in this case. In addition, this case is closed and further filings will not change this fact. Therefore, this motion will also be denied for lack of merit.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner's motion for reconsideration [dkt. #85] is DENIED.

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 23, 2011.

Deborah R. Tofil

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Gravitt v. Tyzkiewicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 23, 2011
Case Number 00-10237 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Gravitt v. Tyzkiewicz

Case Details

Full title:DARWIN GRAVITT, Petitioner, v. ZBGNIEW TYZKIEWICZ, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

Case Number 00-10237 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 23, 2011)