From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graves v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2006
No. CIV S-03-2607 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-2607 GEB GGH P.

February 3, 2006


ORDER


This action is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On January 24, 2006, petitioner filed a motion for appointment of counsel. This motion should be addressed to the Ninth Circuit. Accordingly, this motion is disregarded.

On January 25, 2006, petitioner filed a motion for production of documents requesting that the court send to the Ninth Circuit all records relevant to his appeal. Petitioner is informed that the Clerk of the Court will send the Ninth Circuit all records relevant to his appeal.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's January 24, 2006, motion for appointment of counsel is disregarded;

2. Petitioner's January 25, 2006, motion for production of documents is denied as unnecessary.


Summaries of

Graves v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2006
No. CIV S-03-2607 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Graves v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY GRAVES, Petitioner, v. JAMES YATES, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 3, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-2607 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2006)