The record fails to show any objection on appellant's part with respect to any conduct of the trial judge challenged by appellant. In Graves v. State, 165 Ark. 30, 33, 243 S.W. 855 (1922), we held that the failure to make such an objection or exception waived the alleged error on appeal. This is in accordance with our procedure, 15 Ark. L. R. 69, and we accordingly hold that appellant's contention is without merit. The judgment is affirmed.

Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283, 101 So. 511. Defendant should have had the affirmative charge. Anderson v. State, 20 Ala. App. 154, 101 So. 162; Gardner v. State, 20 Ala. App. 469, 102 So. 914; Clements v. State, 19 Ala. App. 640, 99 So. 832; Graves v. State, 18 Ala. App. 434, 92 So. 908. Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Appellant did not have possession of that part of the house where the whisky was found, and he was due the affirmative charge. Fillmore v. State, 18 Ala. App. 334, 92 So. 94; Roberson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 69, 88 So. 355; Graves v. State, 18 Ala. App. 434, 92 So. 908; Mitchell v State, 18 Ala. App. 119, 89 So. 98; Adams v. State, 18 Ala. App. 143, 90 So. 42; Jones v. State, 18 Ala. App. 116, 90 So. 135; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401, 85 So. 835; Hanson v. State, ante, p. 249, 96 So. 655; 3 Bouvier's Law Dict. 2636. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and O.B. Cornelius, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.