Graves v. Martel

Full title: PETER DALE GRAVES, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 8, 2009

No. CIV S-06-0885 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0885 LKK DAD P.

June 8, 2009

ORDER

DALE DROZD, Magistrate Judge

Petitioner has filed a motion for an extension of time to file a traverse in this matter. Good cause appearing, the court will grant petitioner's motion.

Petitioner has also filed a motion to have respondent send him a copy of all of the 2009 cases cited in the answer. In response to petitioner's motion, respondent has filed and served on petitioner a copy of all of the 2009 cases cited in the answer. Accordingly, the court will deny petitioner's motion as moot.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's May 29, 2009 motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 35) is granted;

2. Petitioner is granted up to and including July 22, 2009, in which to file and serve a traverse; and

3. Petitioner's May 29, 2009 motion to have respondent send him a copy of all of the 2009 cases cited in the answer (Doc. No. 36) is denied as moot.