From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graves v. Duganne

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 6, 1980
620 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1980)

Opinion

No. 75-1231.

June 6, 1980.

Jerry D. Anker, Lichtman, Abeles, Anker Nagle, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Lawrence Wright, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; William P. Copple, Judge.

Before CHAMBERS and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and CONTI, District Judge.

The Honorable Samuel Conti, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.


ORDER OF REMAND.

This case now on rehearing is remanded to the district court with the suggestion that that court vacate the judgment or judgments in the case on proof of performance of the settlement agreement of May 15, 1980. The trial court is authorized to dismiss with prejudice. The parties will bear their own costs.

The court acknowledges that the majority opinion, Graves v. Duganne, 581 F.2d 222 (9th Cir. 1978), was vitiated by the Supreme Court opinion in Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 98 S.Ct. 1042, 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978).

Any party may move for reconsideration of the foregoing order within 14 days from the date of filing herein.


Summaries of

Graves v. Duganne

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 6, 1980
620 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1980)
Case details for

Graves v. Duganne

Case Details

Full title:W. DORREAN GRAVES, AKA W. DORREAN GRAVES WALKER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 6, 1980

Citations

620 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Vanelli v. Reynolds School Dist. No. 7

Though the court concluded that no liberty interest existed, the case is distinguishable in that the…