From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graves v. Clinton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-03156 MCE KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-03156 MCE KJN PS

08-09-2011

PETER GRAVES, Plaintiff, v. HILLARY RANDOM CLINTON, ET AL, Defendant.


BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENDALL J. NEWMAN

MINUTE ORDER

The court is in receipt of plaintiff's "Response to Defendant's Request for Summary Judgment or Dismissal" (Dkt. No. 60). The court construes this document as all or part of an opposition to defendant's pending motion to dismiss and for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 59). To the extent plaintiff is seeking any affirmative relief, which is entirely unclear, he must file a properly noticed motion. See L.R. 230.

Matt Caspar,

Courtroom Deputy for the

Honorable Kendall J. Newman


Summaries of

Graves v. Clinton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-03156 MCE KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Graves v. Clinton

Case Details

Full title:PETER GRAVES, Plaintiff, v. HILLARY RANDOM CLINTON, ET AL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-03156 MCE KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)