From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gravely v. Majestro

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 16, 2020
No. 19-2422 (4th Cir. Mar. 16, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-2422

03-16-2020

RICHARD GRAVELY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANTHONY MAJESTRO; MARVIN W. MASTERS; BENJAMIN L. BAILEY, Defendants - Appellees.

Richard Gravely, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00192) Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Gravely, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Gravely appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Gravely's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gravely v. Majestro, No. 3:19-cv-00192 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 10, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Gravely v. Majestro

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 16, 2020
No. 19-2422 (4th Cir. Mar. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Gravely v. Majestro

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD GRAVELY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANTHONY MAJESTRO; MARVIN W…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 16, 2020

Citations

No. 19-2422 (4th Cir. Mar. 16, 2020)