From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graubard Mollen v. 600 Third Avenue Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 3, 1997
240 A.D.2d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 3, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.).


Since the alleged interference with plaintiff's ingress and egress never resulted in denial of access, there was no actual partial eviction, and plaintiff's obligation to pay rent was never suspended ( see, Barash v. Pennsylvania Term. Real Estate Corp., 26 N.Y.2d 77, 82-84). The IAS Court also properly found that the lease was clear in requiring plaintiff to replenish the letter of credit that it had given defendant in lieu of a cash security deposit in the event it was drawn down by defendant to make good a default in the payment of rent.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Wallach, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Graubard Mollen v. 600 Third Avenue Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 3, 1997
240 A.D.2d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Graubard Mollen v. 600 Third Avenue Assoc

Case Details

Full title:GRAUBARD MOLLEN HOROWITZ POMERANZ SHAPIRO, Appellant, v. 600 THIRD AVENUE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 272

Citing Cases

Graubard v. 600 Third Avenue Associates

The court noted that Associates was justified in drawing on the letter of credit due to the firm's failure to…

RAY W CUT INC. v. 240 W. 37 LLC

nnsylvania Terminal Real Estate Corp., 26 NY2d 77, 83 (1970) (citing Lawrence v. Edwin A. Denham Co., 58 Misc…