From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grasso v. N.Y. City Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 2, 2009
63 A.D.3d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 682.

June 2, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered December 8, 2008, which granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Sarcone Law Firm, PLLC, White Plains (Stephen M. DeLuca of counsel), for appellant.

Martin B. Schnabel, Brooklyn (Gena B. Usenheimer of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.


Petitioner lacks standing to challenge respondents' determination to prohibit him from operating a crane on any of their projects or property. To establish standing, he was required to show, in addition to an "injury in fact," that the injury he asserts "fall[s] within the zone of interests or concerns sought to be promoted or protected by the statutory provision under which the agency has acted" ( see New York State Assn. of Nurse Anesthetists v Novello, 2 NY3d 207, 211). Petitioner failed to identify any statutory provision pursuant to which respondents acted in making their determination. Were we to reach the merits of petitioner's claim, we would find it without validity.


Summaries of

Grasso v. N.Y. City Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 2, 2009
63 A.D.3d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Grasso v. N.Y. City Transit Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY L. GRASSO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 2, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4274
879 N.Y.S.2d 460

Citing Cases

Lino v. City of N.Y.

Additionally, defendants' assertion that they did not have the opportunity to develop an adequate record…