From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grassmueck v. Bishop

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Apr 27, 2010
Civil Case No. 09-1257-HU (D. Or. Apr. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 09-1257-HU.

April 27, 2010

Julie R. Vacura, Danielle J. Hunsaker, Larkins Vacura, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Russell De Van, Scottsdale, Arizona, Yada Schneider, Prescott, Arizona, Stephen Bishop, Houston, Texas, Pro Se Defendants.


ORDER


The Honorable Dennis Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on April 5, 2010. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation dated April 5, 2010 (#112) in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (#15 Schneider, #21 DeVan, #65 Bishop) are granted. The claims against defendants Schneider, DeVan and Bishop are dismissed without prejudice.

DATED this 27th day of April, 2010.


Summaries of

Grassmueck v. Bishop

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Apr 27, 2010
Civil Case No. 09-1257-HU (D. Or. Apr. 27, 2010)
Case details for

Grassmueck v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. GRASSMUECK, Court Appointed Receiver for Global Online Direct…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Apr 27, 2010

Citations

Civil Case No. 09-1257-HU (D. Or. Apr. 27, 2010)