From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grantham v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 9, 2015
5:14-CV-485-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 9, 2015)

Opinion

5:14-CV-485-BR

06-09-2015

Charles Grantham and Elizabeth Grantham, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. Bank National Association, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Decision by Court. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court adopts the M&R as its own and plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). This case is closed. This judgment filed and entered on June 9 , 2015, and served on: Charles Grantham (via US Mail at 642 Ditchbank Road, Goldsboro, NC 27534 )
Elizabeth Grantham (via US Mail at 642 Ditchbank Road, Goldsboro, NC 27534 )
June 9, 2015

JULIE RICHARDS JOHNSTON, CLERK

/s/_________

By: Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Grantham v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Jun 9, 2015
5:14-CV-485-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Grantham v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:Charles Grantham and Elizabeth Grantham, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. Bank National…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 9, 2015

Citations

5:14-CV-485-BR (E.D.N.C. Jun. 9, 2015)

Citing Cases

Sherwood Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. Jackson

Actions removed by pro se plaintiffs or defendants from state court to federal court also are subject to…

Hawkins v. Carter

Actions removed by pro se plaintiffs or defendants from state court to federal court also are subject to…