From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grantham v. Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Aug 7, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv143 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv143

08-07-2015

WILLIAM EDWIN GRANTHAM v. JOHN P. ANDERSON, ET AL.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

William Edwin Grantham, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice as moot.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. A final judgment shall be entered in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

It is SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 7th day of August, 2015.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Grantham v. Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Aug 7, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv143 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Grantham v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM EDWIN GRANTHAM v. JOHN P. ANDERSON, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 7, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv143 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2015)