From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Warden of Burlington Cnty. Det. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jun 25, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-15493 (RBK) (D.N.J. Jun. 25, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 19-15493 (RBK)

06-25-2020

JIMMIE T. GRANT, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN OF BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et. al., Respondents.


OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT B. KUGLER , U.S.D.J.

This matter comes before the Court by way of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 8, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why the Court should not dismiss this matter for Petitioner's failure to exhaust his state remedies. On June 24, 2020, however, the post office returned the Order sent to Petitioner on June 8, 2020, as undeliverable, as Petitioner was released or transferred from the Burlington County Detention Facility, in Mount Holly, New Jersey. (ECF No. 10). Petitioner has not contacted the Court in the intervening time to provide an updated address.

Local Civil Rule 10.1(a) requires unrepresented parties to notify the Court of any change in address within 7 days. The Rule further provides that, failure to file such notice "may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court." Id. Indeed, failure to apprise the Court of an address change may result in the outright dismissal of the case for failure to proceed, or an administrative termination of the action without prejudice. See, e.g., Allebach v. Cathell, No. 06-5005, 2009 WL 2147145 (D.N.J. July 15, 2009); Boretsky v. Corzine, No. 08-2265, 2008 WL 2512916 (D.N.J. June 23, 2008).

As the Court does not have a current address for Petitioner, the matter cannot proceed at this time. The Court will therefore administratively terminate the proceedings, without prejudice to Petitioner's right to reinstate this action by notifying the Court and Respondent of his new address within 30 days. Failure to provide an updated address within 30 days of the date of this Order may result in dismissal of this matter for lack of prosecution.

THEREFORE, it is on this 25th day of June 2020,

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this matter for failure to comply with Local Civil Rule 10.1(a), without prejudice to reinstatement should Petitioner notify the Court of his changed address within thirty (30) days from entry of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that failure to comply with this Order may result in the matter being dismissed for lack of prosecution; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order on Petitioner at his last known address by regular mail.

s/Robert B. Kugler

ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Grant v. Warden of Burlington Cnty. Det. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jun 25, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-15493 (RBK) (D.N.J. Jun. 25, 2020)
Case details for

Grant v. Warden of Burlington Cnty. Det. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE T. GRANT, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN OF BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jun 25, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 19-15493 (RBK) (D.N.J. Jun. 25, 2020)