From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 21, 2005
Nos. 05-05-00920-CR, 05-05-00921-CR, 05-05-00922-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)

Opinion

Nos. 05-05-00920-CR, 05-05-00921-CR, 05-05-00922-CR

Opinion Issued July 21, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F93-41138-Hmj, F93-41533-MJ, F98-01839-Hmj. Dismissed.

Before Justices MORRIS, LANG, and MAZZANT.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


George Daniel Grant pleaded guilty to two aggravated sexual assault of a child offenses and one indecency with a child offense. Adjudication of guilt was originally deferred, and appellant was placed on community supervision. The State moved to adjudicate guilt and, following a hearing, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty of each offense. Punishment was assessed at forty years' confinement for each aggravated sexual assault and twenty years' confinement for the indecency with a child. The trial court's rule 25.2(d) certifications state that appellant waived his right to appeal, and the documents from the adjudication hearing support the certifications. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Grant v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 21, 2005
Nos. 05-05-00920-CR, 05-05-00921-CR, 05-05-00922-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)
Case details for

Grant v. State

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE DANIEL GRANT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jul 21, 2005

Citations

Nos. 05-05-00920-CR, 05-05-00921-CR, 05-05-00922-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)