From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 1, 1995
650 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2114.

March 1, 1995.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Alan L. Postman, Judge.

Gregg Grant, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.


As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a ten year mandatory minimum provision on the defendant's thirty year sentence, when he was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, not a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993). Therefore, the ten year mandatory provision is reversed. The remaining arguments raised by the defendant lack merit.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.


Summaries of

Grant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 1, 1995
650 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Grant v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGG GRANT, ETC., APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 1, 1995

Citations

650 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Aburto v. State

The Reply appears to state a legally sufficient claim. See Wright v. State, 779 So.2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000);…