From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 18, 2007
954 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D06-2223.

April 18, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 562005CF001764A 562005CF001792A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of attempted second degree murder and battery. He argues that the trial court erred in allowing the state to cross-examine him on a statement he made to a detective because it was beyond the scope of direct examination. We find no abuse of discretion. Appellant also argues that the victim, a former crack user, should not have been allowed to testify that he had stopped using crack and was enrolled in a recovery program. Although we agree this evidence was not admissible, it was harmless.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, C.J., KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 18, 2007
954 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Grant v. State

Case Details

Full title:Willie Junior GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 18, 2007

Citations

954 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)