From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Samuels

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 22, 2022
CV 22-0790 JFW (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-0790 JFW (PVC)

08-22-2022

MICHAEL DAVID GRANT, Petitioner, v. DANNY SAMUELS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION

JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) is DENIED; and

(2) Respondent is ORDERED to Answer the Petition within 30 days of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Grant v. Samuels

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 22, 2022
CV 22-0790 JFW (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Grant v. Samuels

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DAVID GRANT, Petitioner, v. DANNY SAMUELS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 22, 2022

Citations

CV 22-0790 JFW (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2022)