From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Pharmavite, LLC

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
May 23, 2006
No. 8:05CV66 (D. Neb. May. 23, 2006)

Opinion

No. 8:05CV66.

May 23, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on defendants' motions to strike the affidavit of Michael Sorrell, M.D. ("Dr. Sorrell") (Filing Nos. 65 and 70). After examination of the affidavit, briefs of the parties and evidentiary submissions, the Court will deny the motions to strike Dr. Sorrell's affidavit. The Court will preclude Dr. Sorrell from providing any opinions expressed in paragraphs 3b and 3d of his affidavit because Dr. Sorrell's written report fails to provide the "basis and reasons" which support those opinions as required by Fed.R. of Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motions to strike the expert affidavit of Dr. Michael Sorrell is denied. Michael Sorrell, M.D., will be precluded from testifying to any opinions outside of those expressed in his January 27, 2006, deposition and in paragraphs 3a and 3c of his March 29, 2006, affidavit.


Summaries of

Grant v. Pharmavite, LLC

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
May 23, 2006
No. 8:05CV66 (D. Neb. May. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Grant v. Pharmavite, LLC

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN M. GRANT and REX BECK, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. PHARMAVITE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: May 23, 2006

Citations

No. 8:05CV66 (D. Neb. May. 23, 2006)

Citing Cases

Saulsbery v. Mark Twain Water Zone, LLC

A deposition may not cure the omission. See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th…