From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Marshall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 2000
270 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted January 18, 2000

March 9, 2000

In an action pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint to recover money owed on a promissory note, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated July 15, 1999, as denied that branch of his cross motion which was to dismiss the action as time-barred.

John Marshall, Plainview, N.Y., appellant pro se.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that issues of fact exist as to whether the defendant's May 19, 1995, payment to the plaintiff of the sum of $60,000 revived the debt and took the plaintiff's claim out of the Statute of Limitations (see, Stabulas v. Brooks Piece Cye Works Corp., 111 A.D.2d 803, 804 ; Matter of McDonald, 79 A.D.2d 754 ).

BRACKEN, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grant v. Marshall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 2000
270 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Grant v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:SELMALEE GRANT a/k/a SELMALEE KAUFMAN, respondent, v. JOHN MARSHALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 835