From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Haynes

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Mar 11, 2021
NO. 09-20-00257-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2021)

Opinion

NO. 09-20-00257-CV

03-11-2021

AVONDA GRANT AND RAYMOND GRANT, Appellants v. DEATRA HAYNES, Appellee


On Appeal from the 1st District Court Jasper County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 38437

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Avonda Grant and Raymond Grant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment signed on October 7, 2020. On January 12, 2021, we notified the parties that the clerk's record had not been filed due to appellants' failure to pay, or to arrange to pay, the District Clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record. The notice also warned Appellants that their appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless they either paid the filing fee or established that they paid the fee or needed additional time to do so. By separate letter on January 12, 2021, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Appellants remitted the filing fee for the appeal. None of the parties filed a response. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); see also Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Submitted on March 10, 2021
Opinion Delivered March 11, 2021 Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Grant v. Haynes

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Mar 11, 2021
NO. 09-20-00257-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Grant v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:AVONDA GRANT AND RAYMOND GRANT, Appellants v. DEATRA HAYNES, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Mar 11, 2021

Citations

NO. 09-20-00257-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2021)