From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Bouffard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Aug 26, 2013
(D. Me. Aug. 26, 2013)

Opinion

08-26-2013

CHRISTOPHER GRANT, Petitioner v. RODNEY BOUFFARD, Respondent


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On July 11, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, her Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on July 25, 2013, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further a certificate of appealability shall not issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

Nancy Torresen

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Grant v. Bouffard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Aug 26, 2013
(D. Me. Aug. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Grant v. Bouffard

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER GRANT, Petitioner v. RODNEY BOUFFARD, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Aug 26, 2013

Citations

(D. Me. Aug. 26, 2013)