Opinion
Civil Action No. 9-1407
12-28-2012
GRANT STREET GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. REALAUCTIONS.COM, LLC, Defendant.
AMBROSE, Senior District Judge
ORDER OF COURT
The parties have filed excessively extensive Objections to deposition designations, counter designations and trial exhibits. (ECF Nos. 454-456, 463). Based on my review of the same, I find as follows: 1. Unless otherwise noted below, all objections based on form, foundation, argumentative, speculation, confusion, repetition, compound, duplicative, incomplete document, vagueness/ambiguousness, no predicate for refreshing recollection, or assuming facts not in evidence are denied without prejudice as premature as these can be cured at trial. 2. Unless otherwise noted below, all objections based on "prejudice" or "fairness" are denied. The standard requires that the moving party show the evidence should be excluded because its probative value is "substantially outweighed by a danger of....unfair prejudice." F.R.E 403. Unfair prejudice means an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis. The sum total of the movant's argument is the word "prejudicial" or "fairness" and thus, the movant has failed to provide any grounds for meaningful assessment of the objection. 3. Unless otherwise noted below, all objections based on relevance are denied, without prejudice, as premature. 4. Unless otherwise noted below, all objections as to exhibits that a party suggests that it "may offer" but is not sure it will offer are denied, without prejudice, as premature. 5. Unless otherwise noted below, all objections as to mischaracterizations based on prior testimony or improper characterization of exhibit are denied as parties may counter designate. 6. Unless otherwise noted below, for rulings on all objections based on a Motion in Limine, please refer to the ruling on that Motion in Limine for the ruling on the objection. 7. As to the remainder of the objections, I rule as follows:
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Grant Street Group's Objections to Deposition Designation (ECF No. 454) ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Witness ¦Objection / Pages ¦Ruling ¦ +--------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------¦ ¦David Dering, ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Robert ¦ ¦Denied, see FRCP 32(a)(3) and FRE¦ ¦O'Neill, ¦General Objection to ¦ ¦ ¦Jeffery ¦unavailability ¦801(d)(2)(D) ¦ ¦Harris, Daniel¦ ¦ ¦ ¦J. Veres, ¦ ¦ ¦ +--------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Granted to the extent said ¦ ¦ ¦All Objections as to Grant¦testimony relates the Motion ¦ ¦Robert O'Neill¦Street's Motion ¦in Limine #6, which was granted ¦ ¦Robert Panoff ¦in Limine #6 re: ¦on September 25, 2012 prohibiting ¦ ¦ ¦Inequitable Conduct ¦certain testimony, argument, ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦suggestions or evidence relating to¦ ¦ ¦ ¦inequitable conduct ¦ +--------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦98:16-18 (legal ¦ ¦ ¦Danie Veres ¦conclusion) 99: 5-7 (legal¦As to legal conclusion, granted. ¦ ¦ ¦conclusion) ¦ ¦ +--------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦General Objection based on¦Denied, see Order denying Motion ¦ ¦ ¦reasons set forth in Grant¦in Limine ¦ ¦ ¦Street's Motion ¦ ¦ ¦James Griffith¦in Limine #1 re: ¦#1. ¦ ¦ ¦testimony and Evidence ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦regarding eBay ¦Denied, see Order denying Motion ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦in Limine #1. ¦ ¦ ¦Hearsay Objections ¦ ¦ +--------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------¦ ¦Ian Yorty ¦83-84 94: 9-10 94:15-95:9 ¦Designations withdrawn ¦ +--------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦All Objections relating to¦Granted in part and denied in part ¦ ¦Donald O'Neill¦Motion in Limine re: ¦as is consistent with my ruling on ¦ ¦ ¦Issue Preclusion ¦Motion in Limine regarding issue ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦preclusion at ECF No. 483 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Grant Street's Objections to Defendant's Trial Exhibits (ECF No. 455) ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Ex. No. ¦Objection ¦Ruling ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Hearsay, as¦ ¦ ¦D16 ¦to cover ¦Denied for reason stated ¦ ¦ ¦letter ¦ ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied without prejudice to be reasserted at time of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦trial if and when the exhibit is used. The objection ¦ ¦D38 ¦Hearsay ¦and response are so cryptic that the court is unable to¦ ¦ ¦ ¦make a ruling at this time as to whether the statements¦ ¦ ¦ ¦fall under FRE 801(d)(2) and/or 803(6). ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied without prejudice to be reasserted at time of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦trial if and when the exhibit is used. The objection ¦ ¦D39 ¦Hearsay ¦and response are so cryptic that the court is unable to¦ ¦ ¦ ¦make a ruling at this time as to whether the statements¦ ¦ ¦ ¦fall under FRE 801(d)(2) and/or 803(6). ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Hearsay, as¦ ¦ ¦D45 ¦to email ¦Granted to the extent J. Taylor will not be testifying ¦ ¦ ¦from J. ¦at trial. ¦ ¦ ¦Taylor ¦ ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D52 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on FRE 803(17) ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D62 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on FRE 803(6) ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D90 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied, not offered for truth but offered for limited ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦purpose of showing the communication took place ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D95 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on FRE 803(18) ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D96 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). Additionally, not offered for ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦truth just date ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D97 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6), not offered for truth but ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦rather to show date ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D98 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6) ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D99 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6) ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D100 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6) ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D101 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6) ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D102 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6) ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D113 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). Additionally, not offered for ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦truth. ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D114 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). Additionally, not offered for ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦truth. ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D115 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). Additionally, not offered for ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦truth. ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D116 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). Additionally, not offered for ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦truth. ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D117 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). Additionally, not offered for ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦truth. ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D158 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D159 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D160 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D161 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D162 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6). ¦ +---------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦D165 ¦Hearsay ¦Denied ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------+ ¦D166¦Hearsay ¦Denied ¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D173¦Hearsay ¦Denied without prejudice¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D189¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6) ¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D190¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6) ¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D191¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(6) ¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D200¦Hearsay ¦Denied based on 803(18) ¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D204¦Hearsay (video)¦Denied without prejudice¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D230¦Hearsay ¦Denied ¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D241¦Hearsay ¦Denied ¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D260¦Hearsay ¦Denied ¦ +----+---------------+------------------------¦ ¦D263¦Hearsay ¦Denied ¦ +---------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Realauctions's Objections to Deposition Designation (ECF No. 456-1) ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Witness ¦Objection Pages ¦Ruling ¦ +---------+------------------------------------------------+------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Granted; witness ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦can rephrase ¦ ¦ ¦19:17-20:23 (hearsay) 45:18-46:7 (legal ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦conclusion) 46:10-17 (legal conclusion) ¦Denied ¦ ¦David ¦46:18-19; 22-25 - 47:1-4) (legal conclusion) ¦ ¦ ¦Epner ¦65:9-66:9 (hearsay) 80:14-81:1 (legal ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦conclusion) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Granted ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied Denied ¦ +---------+------------------------------------------------+------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied; doesn't ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦match with a ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦statement or a ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦question calling ¦ ¦Kenneth ¦59:20-23 (hearsay) ¦for hearsay ¦ ¦Dale ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Farmer, ¦126:17-26 140:2-3 (hearsay) 140:15-18 (misstates¦Designations ¦ ¦Jr. ¦content) 141:19-22 (hearsay) ¦withdrawn ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ +---------+------------------------------------------------+------------------¦ ¦Alexander¦5:23-7:9 (delay) 8:5-21 (delay) 94:13-96:19 ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦Lizano ¦(fairness) ¦Denied ¦ +---------+------------------------------------------------+------------------¦ ¦Doug ¦37:14-38:16 (hearsay) 89:12-91:12 (hearsay) ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦107:6-108:8 (legal conclusion) 108:20-109:5 ¦Denied ¦ ¦McClendon¦(legal conclusion) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ +---------+------------------------------------------------+------------------¦ ¦ ¦54:15-55:16 (legal conclusion) 55:25-57:11 ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦(legal conclusion) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦57:14-20 (legal conclusion) 57:23-58:18 (legal ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦conclusion) ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦Craig ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Mclntyre ¦65:7-66:13 (legal conclusion) 66:16-67:18 (legal¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦conclusion) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦67:22-68:3 (legal conclusion) 71:3-73:5 ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦(hearsay) 73:22-74:13 (hearsay) 82:12-25 ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦(hearsay) 83:3-84:7 (hearsay) 84:10-23 (hearsay)¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦100:3-13 (hearsay) 117:8-23 (legal conclusion) ¦ ¦ +---------+------------------------------------------------+------------------¦ ¦Eric ¦100:8-19 (legal conclusion) 129:11-16 (hearsay) ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦Benson ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------+------------------------------------------------+------------------¦ ¦Ronald E.¦11:11-12, 14 (hearsay) 13:18-15:11 (hearsay) ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦Rubin ¦49:19-52:15 (hearsay) ¦Denied ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦65:17-18 (hearsay) 65:23-67:7 (hearsay) ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦80:5-18 (hearsay) 81:17-82:11 (hearsay) ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦87:5-7 (hearsay) 91:10-12 (hearsay) ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦91:19-92:4 (hearsay) 92:17-93:7 (hearsay) ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦103:19-22 (hearsay) 107:19-108:11 (hearsay) ¦ ¦ +---------+---------------------------------------------+---------------------¦ ¦Marc ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦24:19-25:8 (hearsay) 27:8-22 (hearsay) ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦Thomashaw¦41:10-13 (hearsay) 152:7-153:7 (hearsay) ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦192:5-13 (hearsay) ¦ ¦ ¦6-28-11 ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------+---------------------------------------------+---------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Granted as to ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦43:7-10, otherwise ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦denied Granted as to ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦47:22-48:1, 13-14, ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦otherwise denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Granted as to ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦49:17-21, 50:10-22, ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦otherwise denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Granted as to ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦53:4-13, 18-24, ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦otherwise ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Granted as to ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦64:1-11, 24-25; ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦65:8-13, 1921, ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦otherwise denied ¦ ¦ ¦40:5-43:10 (hearsay) 46:11-48:14(hearsay) ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦48:21-49:2 (hearsay) 49:10-51:6 (hearsay) ¦Granted as to ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦76:14-19, 77:4-19; ¦ ¦ ¦51:10-55:10 (hearsay) ¦78:17-21; ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦56:4-24 (hearsay) 58:19-20 (hearsay) ¦79:1-4, otherwise ¦ ¦ ¦62:13-65:21 (hearsay) ¦denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Marc ¦72:3-75:16 (hearsay) 75:22-25 (hearsay) 76:5 ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦(hearsay) 76:8-83:6 (hearsay) ¦ ¦ ¦Thomashaw¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦92:2-18 (hearsay) 98:13-99:6 (hearsay) ¦ ¦ ¦10-18-11 ¦99:9-19 (hearsay) 117:2-118:5 (hearsay) ¦Granted as to ¦ ¦ ¦125:2-127:25 (hearsay) 130:5-133:22 (hearsay)¦99:15-17, otherwise ¦ ¦ ¦134:5-136:14 (hearsay) 136:17-137:1 (hearsay)¦denied ¦ ¦ ¦140:14-148:21 (hearsay) 158:12-159:2 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦(hearsay) 159:4-25 (hearsay) 161:5-11 ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦(hearsay) 161:14-162:21 (hearsay) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦162:24-163:4 (hearsay) 163:7-18 (hearsay) ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦163:25-164:1 (hearsay) 164:18-166:17 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦(hearsay) 166:20-168:10 (hearsay) ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦168:13-169:4 (hearsay) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Denied ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦175:2-4 (hearsay) 175:7-13 (hearsay) 176:16-182:6 ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦(hearsay) 182:9-184:1 (hearsay) 184:4-189:4 ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦(hearsay) 189:7-192:21(hearsay) 194:7-196:23 ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦(hearsay) 197:1-198:4 (hearsay) 205:4-206:10 ¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦(hearsay) 206:13-24 (hearsay) 230:15-232:1 (hearsay)¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Realauctions's Objections to Grant Street's Exhibit List (ECF No. 456-2) ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Ex. No. ¦Ruling on Hearsay Objections ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦3 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦4 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦5 ¦Denied without prejudice ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦24 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦25 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦27 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦30 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦31 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦32 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦35 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦36 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦37 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦38 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦39 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦40 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦41 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦46 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦48 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦49 ¦Denied, without prejudice ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦54 ¦Denied, without prejudice ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦58 ¦Denied, without prejudice ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦61 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦62 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦64 ¦Granted except pages or excerpts that are actually statements of an¦ ¦ ¦opposing party. Objection as to those pages or excerpts are denied.¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦65 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦66 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦71 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦73 ¦Denied without prejudice ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦76 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦78 ¦Granted ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦93 ¦Denied without prejudice ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦95 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦97 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦115 ¦Denied without prejudice ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦117 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦118 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦121 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦128 ¦Denied ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦143 ¦Granted ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦168 ¦Granted ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦173 ¦Granted ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦174 ¦Granted ¦ +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦175 ¦Granted ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Realauctions's Objections to Counter Deposition Designation (ECF No. 463) ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦Witness ¦Hearsay Objections ¦Ruling ¦ +---------------+--------------------+----------------------------------------¦ ¦David Dering ¦35:13-36:5 ¦Granted Granted ¦ ¦ ¦71:22-73:3 ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------------+----------------------------------------¦ ¦Robert O'Neill ¦20:22-22:10 ¦Granted as to 21:16-22:2; Denied as to ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦all other portions ¦ +---------------+--------------------+----------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦57:8-60:13 ¦ ¦ ¦David Landes 7/¦ ¦ ¦ ¦27/11 ¦62:15-69:12 ¦Denied Denied Denied ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦69:15-72:20 ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------------+----------------------------------------¦ ¦David Landes 11¦81:9-82:1 ¦Denied ¦ ¦/15/02 ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------------+----------------------------------------¦ ¦David Landes 10¦35:6-41:7 42:1-49:25¦Denied Denied ¦ ¦/2/06 ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------+--------------------+----------------------------------------¦ ¦Jeffery Harris ¦121:20-121:25 ¦Granted ¦ +---------------+--------------------+----------------------------------------¦ ¦Robert Panoff ¦63:8-67-18 ¦Denied ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Just as a note: Grant Street did not respond to Realauction.com's Objections to Plaintiff's Counter-Designations.
BY THE COURT:
________
Donetta W. Ambrose
United States Senior District Judge