From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GRANT NIDA CONSTR. CO. v. ANDOVER GROUP

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Stark County
Feb 17, 1998
Case No. 1997 CA 00383 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 17, 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 1997 CA 00383

Date of Judgment Entry February 17, 1998

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Civil appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 1997-CV-01908

JUDGMENT: Reversed and remanded

APPEARANCES:

DAVID L. HERBERT, For Plaintiff-Appellee

R. SCOTT HALEY and AMY McKEE HULTHEN, For Defendant-Appellant

JUDGES: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J., Hon. W. Don Reader, J. and Hon. John W. Wise, J.


OPINION


Based upon the Ohio Supreme Court's recent ruling in Rulli vs. Fan Company, (1997) 79 Ohio St.3d 374, which held that when the meaning of the terms of a settlement agreement reached as to litigation are disputed or where there is an actual dispute regarding the existence of a settlement agreement, a trial court is bound to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the matter prior to entering judgment. Upon agreement of appellant and appellee the case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for hearing.

By Farmer, P.J., Reader, J. and Wise, J. concur.

JUDGMENT ENTRY

CASE NO. 1997 CA 00383

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum-Opinion on file, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio is reversed and remanded to the trial court for hearing consistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

GRANT NIDA CONSTR. CO. v. ANDOVER GROUP

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Stark County
Feb 17, 1998
Case No. 1997 CA 00383 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 17, 1998)
Case details for

GRANT NIDA CONSTR. CO. v. ANDOVER GROUP

Case Details

Full title:GRANT NIDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- ANDOVER…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Stark County

Date published: Feb 17, 1998

Citations

Case No. 1997 CA 00383 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 17, 1998)