From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Granowitz v. Hay Foundry and Iron Works

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1932
162 A. 582 (N.J. 1932)

Opinion

Argued May 23, 1932 —

Decided October 17, 1932.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 1165.

For the respondent, Samuel Greenstone.

For the appellant, Heine Laird.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Granowitz v. Hay Foundry and Iron Works

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1932
162 A. 582 (N.J. 1932)
Case details for

Granowitz v. Hay Foundry and Iron Works

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT GRANOWITZ, RESPONDENT, v. HAY FOUNDRY AND IRON WORKS, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1932

Citations

162 A. 582 (N.J. 1932)
162 A. 582

Citing Cases

Vandenberg v. John De Kuyper & Son

Molnar v. American Smelting, etc., Co., 128 N.J.L. 11 ( E. A. 1942). The numerous heart cases in our reports…

Richardson v. Essex National Trunk, c., Co., Inc.

Orlando v. Ferguson, 90 N.J.L. 553; 102 Atl. Rep. 155; Simpson v. New Jersey Stone and Tile Co., 93 N.J.L.…