Opinion
Argued May 23, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 1165.
For the respondent, Samuel Greenstone.
For the appellant, Heine Laird.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.