From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grandy v. Kamphuis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Apr 30, 2014
Case No. 14-CV-0287 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 14-CV-0287

04-30-2014

RICKEY JAMES GRANDY, Plaintiff, v. N. KAMPHUIS and C. HARTMAN, Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

On March 17, 2014, plaintiff Rickey James Grandy filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He subsequently filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but he did not include a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six months prior to filing his complaint, which is necessary for the Court to calculate the plaintiff's initial partial filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six months prior to the filing of his complaint on or before Wednesday, May 21, 2014. Failure to submit the trust account statement will result in the denial of plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be sent to the warden of the institution where the inmate is confined.

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 30th day of April, 2014.

SO ORDERED,

___________________

HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA

U. S. District Judge


Summaries of

Grandy v. Kamphuis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Apr 30, 2014
Case No. 14-CV-0287 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Grandy v. Kamphuis

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY JAMES GRANDY, Plaintiff, v. N. KAMPHUIS and C. HARTMAN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Apr 30, 2014

Citations

Case No. 14-CV-0287 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 30, 2014)