From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grande v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 2007
46 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-10030.

December 18, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nelson, J.), entered September 29, 2006, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Sarahi Grande did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Pena Kahn, PLLC, Bronx, N.Y. (Claire M. Garcia of counsel), for appellants.

Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey Moskovits, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Sarahi Grande did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident ( see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.


Summaries of

Grande v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 2007
46 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Grande v. Fernandez

Case Details

Full title:SARAHI GRANDE et al., Appellants, v. ROMERO FERNANDEZ, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 18, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 10100
847 N.Y.S.2d 480