From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grand Union Company v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1995
220 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 10, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.).


Ordered that the appeals from the decision are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, since no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court's determination that, pursuant to the terms of the lease, the plaintiff was required to pay for the cost of labor for the repairs to the leased premises and the defendant was required to pay for the cost of materials. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly found that there were no triable issues of fact and properly granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Balletta, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grand Union Company v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1995
220 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Grand Union Company v. Klein

Case Details

Full title:GRAND UNION COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant, v. JAMES A. KLEIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 32

Citing Cases

Killane v. Philblad

The court has the "burden to determine whether a triable issue of fact exists" (id., see also Rebecchi, 172…