From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grand Union Co. v. Bayer

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Dec 1, 1909
65 Misc. 505 (N.Y. App. Term 1909)

Opinion

December, 1909.

EMANUEL I.S. HART, for appellant.

ALEXANDER LAMONT, for respondent.


The appeal in this case is taken from an order of the Municipal Court dismissing the plaintiff's complaint upon the ground of want of jurisdiction. No appeal will lie from an order dismissing a complaint. Bevins Rogers, Appellate Term Practice, page 81 and cases cited. The remedy is by appeal from the judgment, which must be entered. Id. In the case at bar the record contains no order, although the notice of appeal recites one; and it appears that a judgment of dismissal was entered from which no appeal is taken.

GOFF and LEHMAN, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Grand Union Co. v. Bayer

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Dec 1, 1909
65 Misc. 505 (N.Y. App. Term 1909)
Case details for

Grand Union Co. v. Bayer

Case Details

Full title:THE GRAND UNION COMIANY, Appellant, v . KATIE BAYER, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1909

Citations

65 Misc. 505 (N.Y. App. Term 1909)
120 N.Y.S. 50

Citing Cases

Matter of German Exchange Bank v. Schlang

But where an order in supplementary proceedings is allowed to lapse, in an instance wherein the court had not…