Opinion
No. F067327.
02-09-2015
GRAND PROSPECT PARTNERS, L.P., Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Respondent, v. ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC. et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants and Appellants.
[Modification of opinion (233 Cal.App.4th 240; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]
THE COURT. — IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed on January 16, 2015, be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:
1. On page 21, just before the start of Subsection B and at the end of the last sentence in the paragraph that begins "Second and related, ..." [233 Cal.App.4th 256, advance report, 1st par., line 9], add a new footnote (the third footnote in the opinion), as follows: "In a rehearing petition, Hill suggests Bergman's guilty plea on charges of possessing illegal gaming equipment provides an independent basis for the trial court's directed verdict ruling against him because he may not collaterally attack his conviction with a civil claim of illegal or prolonged detention. We express no opinion on this contention because Hill did not raise it below and it was not a basis for the trial court's directed verdict ruling."
This modification does not effect a change in the judgment. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.