From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Granberry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 5, 1988
758 S.W.2d 284 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 958-87.

October 5, 1988.

Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 9, Harris County, Al Leal, J.

Jim E. Lavine, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Timothy G. Taft and David Singer, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


Appellant was convicted in a bench trial of driving while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at 120 days in jail, probated, and a $250 fine. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. Granberry v. State, 745 S.W.2d 34 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th] 1987).

Appellant raises one ground for review. We agree with the Court of Appeals that reversal is not required. However, we do not necessarily agree with the Court of Appeals that appellant did not invoke his right to counsel or his right to silence. As is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983).

With this understanding, we refuse appellant's petition for discretionary review.


Summaries of

Granberry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 5, 1988
758 S.W.2d 284 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)
Case details for

Granberry v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Henley GRANBERRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Oct 5, 1988

Citations

758 S.W.2d 284 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)