From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Granado v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jan 11, 2022
CV-20-02142-PHX-DJH (CDB) (D. Ariz. Jan. 11, 2022)

Opinion

CV-20-02142-PHX-DJH (CDB)

01-11-2022

Johnny Angel Granado, Plaintiff, v. David Shinn, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 28) and Magistrate Judge Bibles August 17, 2021 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 51).

Judge Bibles recommends that "should Defendants' motion for summary judgment at ECF No. 40 be denied, Plaintiff should be allowed 15 days from the date the order on the motion at ECF No. 40 is docketed to refile his motion to amend and the motion to amend be deemed timely." No. objections were filed and the Court denied Defendants' motion for summary judgment on January 6, 2022 (Doc. 57). The Court will adopt the R&R but allow Plaintiff 15 days from this Order to refile his motion to amend. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 51) is adopted, with one minor amendment, and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. 28) is denied without prejudice. … …

IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that Plaintiff may refile his motion to amend within 15 days of this Order


Summaries of

Granado v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jan 11, 2022
CV-20-02142-PHX-DJH (CDB) (D. Ariz. Jan. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Granado v. Shinn

Case Details

Full title:Johnny Angel Granado, Plaintiff, v. David Shinn, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Jan 11, 2022

Citations

CV-20-02142-PHX-DJH (CDB) (D. Ariz. Jan. 11, 2022)