From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham Windham Family & Children's Servs. v. Carolyn C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2014
119 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-07-2

In the Matter of NAQUAN L.G. (Anonymous). Graham Windham Family and Children's Services, et al., respondents; Carolyn C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Tanzania N.C. (Anonymous). Graham Windham Family and Children's Services, et al., respondents; Carolyn C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2).

Daniel P. Moskowitz, Jamaica, N.Y., for appellant. Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent Graham Windham Family and Children's Services.


Daniel P. Moskowitz, Jamaica, N.Y., for appellant. Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent Graham Windham Family and Children's Services.
Angela S. Hull, Jamaica, N.Y., attorney for the children.

In related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 383–c, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (McGowan, J.), dated January 30, 2013, which denied her motion to vacate the judicial surrenders of her parental rights executed on January 20, 2011.

ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for a reconstruction hearing with respect to those portions of the proceedings conducted in the above-entitled cases on January 20, 2011, which could not be transcribed because the tape recordings were inaudible, and thereafter to report to this Court with all convenient speed, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim.

The mother contends, among other things, that her judicial surrenders of her parental rights executed on January 20, 2011, were invalid because the Family Court failed to comply with the requirements of Social Services Law § 383–c(3)(b). However, the issues raised by the mother on appeal cannot be resolved on the record provided to this Court since relevant portions of the proceedings held on January 20, 2011, could not be transcribed because the tape recordings were inaudible ( see Matter of Olson v. Olson, 8 A.D.3d 285, 286, 777 N.Y.S.2d 695). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Queens County, for a reconstruction hearing with respect to those portions of the proceedings conducted in the above-entitled cases on January 20, 2011, which could not be transcribed because the tape recordings were inaudible, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim ( see Matter of Chu Man Woo v. Qiong Yun Xi, 100 A.D.3d 883, 954 N.Y.S.2d 790;Matter of Garner v. Garner, 88 A.D.3d 708, 930 N.Y.S.2d 465). DILLON, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Graham Windham Family & Children's Servs. v. Carolyn C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2014
119 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Graham Windham Family & Children's Servs. v. Carolyn C.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NAQUAN L.G. (Anonymous). Graham Windham Family and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

119 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
119 A.D.3d 567
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4927

Citing Cases

Monaco v.

However, when no agreement and no reconstruction is possible, a new trial is required. Indeed, in civil…

Wagner v. Wagner

"Parties to an appeal are entitled to have that record show the facts as they really happened at trial, and…