From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 9, 2013
Case No. 13-cv-01613 NC (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-01613 NC

05-09-2013

BRICEN B. GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., and others, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this action on April 15, 2013. Plaintiff has not responded. Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) requires parties to file and serve an opposition within fourteen days after a motion is filed. A party who does not oppose a motion must file a statement of nonopposition with the court within fourteen days. Civ. L. Rule 7-3(b). "Failure to follow a district court's local rules is a proper ground for dismissal." Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, by May 10, 2013 at 5:00 p.m., plaintiff must show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Graham v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 9, 2013
Case No. 13-cv-01613 NC (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Graham v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:BRICEN B. GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., and others, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-01613 NC (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)