From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. The Hertz Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2021
1:20-cv-00339-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00339-DAD-SKO

06-02-2021

MARK GRAHAM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 20)

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 1, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the entire action with prejudice. (Doc. 20.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Graham v. The Hertz Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2021
1:20-cv-00339-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Graham v. The Hertz Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARK GRAHAM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00339-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)