From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Jan 26, 2022
502 P.3d 735 (Nev. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 83416-COA

01-26-2022

Samantha Marie GRAHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Humboldt County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney


Humboldt County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Humboldt County District Attorney

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Graham argues the district court abused its discretion by amending the judgment of conviction to extend the term of her formal probation from 14 days to 12 months and ordering her to complete mental health court. Graham stipulated to the district court amending the judgment of conviction and thus waived the right to raise this issue. See Ford v. State, 122 Nev. 796, 805, 138 P.3d 500, 506 (2006) (recognizing that a waiver is an intentional relinquishment of a known right). Therefore, we decline to consider this issue on appeal.

Graham also argues the district court improperly negotiated with her in violation of Cripps v. State , 122 Nev. 764, 137 P.3d 1187 (2006). The record before this court does not reflect that the district court engaged in any negotiations prior to the plea agreement. See Cripps, 122 Nev. at 771 n.24, 137 P.3d at 1191 n.24 (prohibiting "judicial involvement and discussion during the plea negotiation process prior to any agreement between the parties"). Therefore, we conclude Graham's claim is without merit, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Graham v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Jan 26, 2022
502 P.3d 735 (Nev. App. 2022)
Case details for

Graham v. State

Case Details

Full title:Samantha Marie GRAHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of Nevada.

Date published: Jan 26, 2022

Citations

502 P.3d 735 (Nev. App. 2022)